RE: Charging for IPs

[Mike Hammett via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

I'm not going to say no.



----- Mike Hammett FD-IX https://fd-ix.com/ DNA Communications https://www.dnacom.com/
From: "Josh Luthman" <josh () imaginenetworksllc com>
To: "North American Network Operators Group" <nanog () lists nanog org>
Cc: "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net>
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2026 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: Charging for IPs


Cogent?


On Fri, Sep 4, 2026, 12:30 PM Mike Hammett via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:

Has anyone else experienced an upstream provider that wants to charge you for the IPs you need to establish BGP 
sessions?

I understand charging for large blocks, but I literally just got a quote for two /31s. I have an existing contract 
elsewhere with them, and they gave me 3x /29s gratis (for three different ASNs, sets of BGP sessions, ec.). Now they're 
charging for each IP.



I thought charging for BGP sessions was ridiculous, but now for individual IPs to use those BGP sessions...





----- Mike Hammett FD-IX https://fd-ix.com/ DNA Communications https://www.dnacom.com/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/64BRVJOZ75TIYJHXLZLTPXZIA63Z3Q3L/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/JS2RKN3QPLPFIX4A4BRKHWSC72NMBHV7/