nanog mailing list archives
Re: Charging for IPs
From: Tim Burke via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2026 16:02:44 +0000
Cogent has good products, just wish their sales practices were a bit better! Their approach is to assign a new rep after X amount of time of no account activity in the CRM — this includes any sort of communication. Moral of the story, if you have a rep you like, just respond to their emails every so often, even if it’s with a “I’m good, don’t need anything”, so you don’t get a failed used car salesman like this guy assigned to you.
On Sep 5, 2026, at 10:38, Shawn L via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote: It seems like they're stepping up their sales -- We were just assigned a "new rep" though we've never done business with them. He started sending meeting requests, which we declined. Then he would call and actually yell at people because "we had a meeting and we're all waiting for you to join". Do they really think that this will help them get customers? Even if I was inclined to buy from them, I would not after that. Shawn -----Original Message----- From: "Tom Beecher via NANOG" <nanog () lists nanog org> Sent: Saturday, September 5, 2026 9:29am To: "North American Network Operators Group" <nanog () lists nanog org> Cc: "LionLink NOC" <noc () lionlink net>, "Tom Beecher" <beecher () beecher cc> Subject: Re: Charging for IPsFriend’s don’t let friends use CogentThis is the only answer.On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 1:09 PM Mike Lyon via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote: I’ve said before and i’ll say it again: Friend’s don’t let friends use Cogent -MikeOn Sep 4, 2026, at 09:58, LionLink NOC via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>wrote:That’s absurd. IMHO. If NTT is an option, you should talk to someone on their carrier sales team. They’ll build a strategic partnership withyou…and last I heard, don’t charge you anything up to a /28.On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 12:37 PM Mike Hammett via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> wrote: I'm not going to say no. ----- Mike Hammett FD-IX https://fd-ix.com/ DNA Communications https://www.dnacom.com/ From: "Josh Luthman" <josh () imaginenetworksllc com> To: "North American Network Operators Group" <nanog () lists nanog org> Cc: "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2026 11:32 AM Subject: Re: Charging for IPs Cogent? On Fri, Sep 4, 2026, 12:30 PM Mike Hammett via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> wrote: Has anyone else experienced an upstream provider that wants to chargeyoufor the IPs you need to establish BGP sessions? I understand charging for large blocks, but I literally just got a quote for two /31s. I have an existing contract elsewhere with them, and they gave me 3x /29s gratis (for three different ASNs, sets of BGP sessions, ec.). Now they're charging for each IP. I thought charging for BGP sessions was ridiculous, but now forindividualIPs to use those BGP sessions... ----- Mike Hammett FD-IX https://fd-ix.com/ DNA Communications https://www.dnacom.com/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/64BRVJOZ75TIYJHXLZLTPXZIA63Z3Q3L/_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/JS2RKN3QPLPFIX4A4BRKHWSC72NMBHV7/_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/D3GWGJFMR4WXLJLLXHQVRL4S5AUJTIG4/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/QS5QM2RT6DWB225LQTG3ZX2RJQYGUOGO/_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/Y4XI3D7GP4HSGU3D7KHWY46GS26XNE4A/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/VWN3ZZJEDJD7ZL5LEP4K6K2BQ2SRL24A/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/53GFC5LC2CZN3B27JPGZIYWYONSMVUAD/
Current thread:
- Charging for IPs Mike Hammett via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Josh Luthman via NANOG (Sep 04)
- RE: Charging for IPs Mike Hammett via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs LionLink NOC via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Mike Lyon via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Andrew Kirch via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Tom Beecher via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: Charging for IPs Shawn L via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: Charging for IPs Tim Burke via NANOG (Sep 05)
- RE: Charging for IPs Mike Hammett via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Josh Luthman via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Bryan Fields via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Chance Callahan via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Brian Knight via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Saku Ytti via NANOG (Sep 04)
- RE: Charging for IPs Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: Charging for IPs Saku Ytti via NANOG (Sep 07)
- RE: Charging for IPs Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Sep 07)
- Re: Charging for IPs Saku Ytti via NANOG (Sep 07)
- RE: Charging for IPs Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Sep 07)
