Re: Charging for IPs

[Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

This has been raised on the thread already a few times, by different
wording, for example Kevin raised the point in a bit different
wording.


Everyone charges for everything already, because everyone wants cost+,
how this is structured is where marketing and psychology lives.

On Mon, 7 Sept 2026 at 09:57, Vasilenko Eduard
<vasilenko.eduard () huawei com> wrote:
> Reminder, cloud providers charge for every single IPv4 address.
> Why network provides should give it for free?
> It is not network providers have started to charge for IPv4.
> Ed/
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
> > Sent: Friday, September 4, 2026 21:55
> > To: North American Network Operators Group <nanog () lists nanog org>
> > Cc: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
> > Subject: Re: Charging for IPs
> >
> > On Fri, 4 Sept 2026 at 21:47, Brian Knight via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hey Brian,
> >
> > >  From a configuration standpoint, without testing it, is it as easy as
> > > configuring an IPV6 BGP neighbor with an IPV4 unicast AFI/SAFI? And
> > > the received routes appear in the table with an IPV6 NH?
> >
> > This might be of interest:
> > https://www.trex.fi/service/turku.html
> >
> > --
> >   ++ytti
> > _______________________________________________
> > NANOG mailing list
> > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/DMDSA
> > VSOHF5GZEHMAU2ATLGLHCQAK46A/



-- 
  ++ytti
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/G7Z4ACHNUCFSWYY5C63IV567N7NL3RCX/