nanog mailing list archives
Re: Charging for IPs
From: Tom Beecher via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2026 09:29:06 -0400
Friend’s don’t let friends use Cogent
This is the only answer. On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 1:09 PM Mike Lyon via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
I’ve said before and i’ll say it again: Friend’s don’t let friends use Cogent -MikeOn Sep 4, 2026, at 09:58, LionLink NOC via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>wrote:That’s absurd. IMHO. If NTT is an option, you should talk to someone on their carrier sales team. They’ll build a strategic partnership withyou…and last I heard, don’t charge you anything up to a /28.On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 12:37 PM Mike Hammett via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> wrote: I'm not going to say no. ----- Mike Hammett FD-IX https://fd-ix.com/ DNA Communications https://www.dnacom.com/ From: "Josh Luthman" <josh () imaginenetworksllc com> To: "North American Network Operators Group" <nanog () lists nanog org> Cc: "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2026 11:32 AM Subject: Re: Charging for IPs Cogent? On Fri, Sep 4, 2026, 12:30 PM Mike Hammett via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> wrote: Has anyone else experienced an upstream provider that wants to chargeyoufor the IPs you need to establish BGP sessions? I understand charging for large blocks, but I literally just got a quote for two /31s. I have an existing contract elsewhere with them, and they gave me 3x /29s gratis (for three different ASNs, sets of BGP sessions, ec.). Now they're charging for each IP. I thought charging for BGP sessions was ridiculous, but now forindividualIPs to use those BGP sessions... ----- Mike Hammett FD-IX https://fd-ix.com/ DNA Communications https://www.dnacom.com/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/64BRVJOZ75TIYJHXLZLTPXZIA63Z3Q3L/_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/JS2RKN3QPLPFIX4A4BRKHWSC72NMBHV7/_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/D3GWGJFMR4WXLJLLXHQVRL4S5AUJTIG4/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/QS5QM2RT6DWB225LQTG3ZX2RJQYGUOGO/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/Y4XI3D7GP4HSGU3D7KHWY46GS26XNE4A/
Current thread:
- Charging for IPs Mike Hammett via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Josh Luthman via NANOG (Sep 04)
- RE: Charging for IPs Mike Hammett via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs LionLink NOC via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Mike Lyon via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Andrew Kirch via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Tom Beecher via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: Charging for IPs Shawn L via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: Charging for IPs Tim Burke via NANOG (Sep 05)
- RE: Charging for IPs Mike Hammett via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Josh Luthman via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Bryan Fields via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Chance Callahan via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Brian Knight via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Saku Ytti via NANOG (Sep 04)
- RE: Charging for IPs Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: Charging for IPs Saku Ytti via NANOG (Sep 07)
- RE: Charging for IPs Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Sep 07)
