nanog mailing list archives
Re: Charging for IPs
From: Bryan Fields via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 14:06:19 -0400
On 9/4/26 12:58, LionLink NOC via NANOG wrote:
That’s absurd. IMHO. If NTT is an option, you should talk to someone on their carrier sales team. They’ll build a strategic partnership with you… and last I heard, don’t charge you anything up to a /28.
Second this. This is a requirement of providing the service, it's like trying to separate volts from amps.
I'd suggest giving them a /31 from your space for the link and then a LOA allowing them to use your IP space :-D
-- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice http://bryanfields.net _______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/HBKEPQ5YD65RK65WDZGXAOATMPW442A2/
Current thread:
- Charging for IPs Mike Hammett via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Josh Luthman via NANOG (Sep 04)
- RE: Charging for IPs Mike Hammett via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs LionLink NOC via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Mike Lyon via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Andrew Kirch via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Bryan Fields via NANOG (Sep 04)
- RE: Charging for IPs Mike Hammett via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Chance Callahan via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Brian Knight via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Saku Ytti via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Josh Luthman via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Justin Streiner via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs michael brooks - ESC via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Crist Clark via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Saku Ytti via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Charging for IPs Mike Hammett via NANOG (Sep 05)
