Re: Charging for IPs

[Christopher Hawker via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

I can either pay $400/month for a 1G transit service and $5/month for the /31 used by the BGP session, or I can pay 
$405/month for the transit service with a /31 free.

Either way, I’m still paying a total of $405/month. Only benefit to the former is if my upstream will allow me to use 
my address space for the PtP link, saving $5/month.

Regards,
Christopher Hawker

Sent from my iPhone

> On 7 Sep 2026, at 12:59 pm, Gary Sparkes via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
>
> The interface addresses for an IPv4  BGP session should be included in the BGP session cost.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
> Sent: Monday, September 7, 2026 3:03 AM
> To: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard () huawei com>
> Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog () lists nanog org>; Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
> Subject: Re: Charging for IPs
>
> This has been raised on the thread already a few times, by different wording, for example Kevin raised the point in a 
> bit different wording.
>
>
> Everyone charges for everything already, because everyone wants cost+, how this is structured is where marketing and 
> psychology lives.
>
> > On Mon, 7 Sept 2026 at 09:57, Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard () huawei com> wrote:
> >
> > Reminder, cloud providers charge for every single IPv4 address.
> > Why network provides should give it for free?
> > It is not network providers have started to charge for IPv4.
> > Ed/
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
> > > Sent: Friday, September 4, 2026 21:55
> > > To: North American Network Operators Group <nanog () lists nanog org>
> > > Cc: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
> > > Subject: Re: Charging for IPs
> > >
> > > On Fri, 4 Sept 2026 at 21:47, Brian Knight via NANOG
> > > <nanog () lists nanog org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey Brian,
> > >
> > > > From a configuration standpoint, without testing it, is it as
> > > > easy as configuring an IPV6 BGP neighbor with an IPV4 unicast
> > > > AFI/SAFI? And the received routes appear in the table with an IPV6 NH?
> > >
> > > This might be of interest:
> > > https://www.trex.fi/service/turku.html
> > >
> > > --
> > >  ++ytti
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > NANOG mailing list
> > > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/
> > > DMDSA
> > > VSOHF5GZEHMAU2ATLGLHCQAK46A/
>
>
>
> --
>  ++ytti
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/G7Z4ACHNUCFSWYY5C63IV567N7NL3RCX/
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/B2XDYF4F2HBFQGKP7JOOLJ4PZLI6J6TE/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/DI7TUOYOIIUDVRPU3SFASE6GPD3OATHJ/