nanog mailing list archives

Re: Charging for IPs


From: Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 09:39:58 +0300

On Tue, 8 Sept 2026 at 01:39, Lukas Tribus <lukas () ltri eu> wrote:

Thanks, that would be RFC 5837, I did not know about that one.

Looks like Arista has joined Juniper in implementing this [1] and
Linux has it since 6.19.


[1] https://arista.my.site.com/AristaCommunity/s/question/0D5Uw000001yvSvKAI/eos-support-for-rfc5837-icmp-extensions

Awesome, can't. see the actual Arista url, would be interesting in specifics.

In Juniper the problem is
  a) basically one platform (QFX, no MX no PTX)
  b) TTL exceeded doesn't get the EO, making it basically useless

We've opened an ER for this, but it's not a priority for Juniper.


I feel like RFC5837 is such that once we get it, we wonder how we
survive before it. But I seem to be fairly alone here (so wrong I
guess), after many years of asking j-nsp and c-nsp to push their
vendors for it.
-- 
  ++ytti
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/Y7M4EBLTWMMKH663QF5VN7GKQTBAPSCZ/


Current thread: