nanog mailing list archives

Re: 1.1.1.1

From: Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 21:18:23 +0200

Am 15.07.2025 um 12:12:28 Uhr schrieb Randy Bush via NANOG:

1.1.1.1 was mis-announced by tata.  see


Didn't RPKI and IR avoid any damage?
If not, are there still relevant AS border routers that just accept
anything?

-- 
Gruß
Marco

Send unsolicited bulk mail to 1752574348muell () cartoonies org

Attachment: _bin
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/XUNM4WIHDMECHNOOKIJX5VL66WE5TQGB/

Current thread:

1.1.1.1 Randy Bush via NANOG (Jul 15)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Marco Moock via NANOG (Jul 15)
  - Re: 1.1.1.1 Francis Booth via NANOG (Jul 15)
    - RE: 1.1.1.1 Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jul 15)
  - Re: 1.1.1.1 Noah van der Aa via NANOG (Jul 15)
    - Re: 1.1.1.1 Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 16)
    - Re: 1.1.1.1 Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jul 16)
    - Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Marc Binderberger via NANOG (Jul 17)
    - Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Mel Beckman via NANOG (Jul 17)
    - Re: Are public DNS a good thing? Marco Davids (Private) via NANOG (Jul 17)
    - Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Rubens Kuhl via NANOG (Jul 17)
    - Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Paul Ebersman via NANOG (Jul 17)

(Thread continues...)