nanog mailing list archives
Re: 1.1.1.1
From: Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 18:24:55 +0300
Any amount of redundancy can be fixed by automation. On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 at 17:15, Tom Beecher via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
Now that everyone has gotten the RPKI rage out of their system, Cloudflare is taking responsibility for this event. Explicitly stated it wasn't a hijack, but their own mistake. https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-1-1-1-1-incident-on-july-14-2025/ On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 3:56 PM Noah van der Aa via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:On 15/07/2025 21:18, Marco Moock via NANOG wrote:Didn't RPKI and IR avoid any damage?Yes - these route leaks didn't actually propagate very far. The only reason they even appeared is because the actual route announced by CF disappeared. All 1.1.1.1 related prefixes (v6 included) were withdrawn around the same time. RIPE's BGPlay tool [0] shows the massive withdrawal spike quite nicely. [0] https://stat.ripe.net/bgplay _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/FP2NP3F4A422JXTPBMVOUSNR6FYVYPUH/_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/7NDDV33O26BWTWD2IBUJBNOGJWJQI3KB/
-- ++ytti _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/DGUVO74MWNNPMIJZEYANSP235OAMNHMH/
Current thread:
- 1.1.1.1 Randy Bush via NANOG (Jul 15)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Marco Moock via NANOG (Jul 15)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Francis Booth via NANOG (Jul 15)
- RE: 1.1.1.1 Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jul 15)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Noah van der Aa via NANOG (Jul 15)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 16)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jul 16)
- Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Marc Binderberger via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Mel Beckman via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? Marco Davids (Private) via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Rubens Kuhl via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Paul Ebersman via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Rubens Kuhl via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Paul Ebersman via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Marc Binderberger via NANOG (Jul 18)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Mel Beckman via NANOG (Jul 18)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Francis Booth via NANOG (Jul 15)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Marco Moock via NANOG (Jul 15)
