nanog mailing list archives
Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1)
From: Rubens Kuhl via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 15:31:11 -0300
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 1:18 PM Paul Ebersman via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
This raises my question: are public DNS like 1.1.1.1 or Google's 8.8.8.8 actually a good thing?rubensk> According to BCP-140, no, not a good thing. That BCP is from 2015...
RFC 1035 is still what defines DNS, hasn't been obsoleted and is from 1987. Perhaps age is not the main factor in defining obsolescence ? Rubens _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/IPQKD6S4BG5TFTMXEEARRUMZIJFUDH5M/
Current thread:
- Re: 1.1.1.1, (continued)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Francis Booth via NANOG (Jul 15)
- RE: 1.1.1.1 Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jul 15)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Noah van der Aa via NANOG (Jul 15)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 16)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jul 16)
- Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Marc Binderberger via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Mel Beckman via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? Marco Davids (Private) via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Rubens Kuhl via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Paul Ebersman via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Rubens Kuhl via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Paul Ebersman via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Marc Binderberger via NANOG (Jul 18)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Mel Beckman via NANOG (Jul 18)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 18)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Javier J via NANOG (Jul 18)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Francis Booth via NANOG (Jul 15)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Jay Acuna via NANOG (Jul 18)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Paul Ebersman via NANOG (Jul 18)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 18)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Robert Kisteleki via NANOG (Jul 18)
