nanog mailing list archives
Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1)
From: Paul Ebersman via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 10:17:30 -0600
This raises my question: are public DNS like 1.1.1.1 or Google's 8.8.8.8 actually a good thing?
rubensk> According to BCP-140, no, not a good thing. That BCP is from 2015... Running a safe and robust recursive service for large numbers of users or a business is not trivial. The reality is that most SMB don't have anyone with the expertise to do this well. For those folks, or folks that don't like/trust their ISP at home, using the quad-X (1.1.1.1, 8.8.8.8, 9.9.9.9) is a much better and safer experience than trying to run their own. Yes, there are some performance and privacy tradeoffs. But the folks running the quad-X are far more likely to be current on DNS trends, not using 2015 habits in a 2025 world. _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/P66UKTWIKRSPLEF2PLT4RQMWSAMGMLTE/
Current thread:
- Re: 1.1.1.1, (continued)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Marco Moock via NANOG (Jul 15)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Francis Booth via NANOG (Jul 15)
- RE: 1.1.1.1 Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Jul 15)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Noah van der Aa via NANOG (Jul 15)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 16)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Saku Ytti via NANOG (Jul 16)
- Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Marc Binderberger via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Mel Beckman via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? Marco Davids (Private) via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Rubens Kuhl via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Paul Ebersman via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Rubens Kuhl via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Paul Ebersman via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Marc Binderberger via NANOG (Jul 18)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Mel Beckman via NANOG (Jul 18)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 18)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Javier J via NANOG (Jul 18)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Francis Booth via NANOG (Jul 15)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Marco Moock via NANOG (Jul 15)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Jay Acuna via NANOG (Jul 18)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Paul Ebersman via NANOG (Jul 18)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 18)
