nanog mailing list archives
Re: Geofeeds are adversarial
From: Barry Shein via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 15:32:53 -0500
Which is a lot like my comment on the law: If a judge in their court room orders you to raise your right leg you are well-advised to raise your right leg. If they order you to also raise your left leg they don't have a problem, you have a problem. On February 17, 2026 at 04:24 nanog () lists nanog org (John Curran via NANOG) wrote:
One observation from watching similar debates over the years – the period in which the Internet technical community could simply respond “that isn’t technically possible” or “that won’t work as intended” and expect the proposed law or regulation to stall seems largely behind us. In many jurisdictions, if policymakers perceive a requirement as necessary, they now proceed regardless. The practical effect of disengagement is often not the abandonment of the mandate, but its advancement with less operational and technical input. I recognize this is not particularly pleasant for those operating networks, but it does suggest that the strategic choice that technical communities now face is deciding how and when to participate to shape discussions toward more pragmatic outcomes – since there will be outcomes, and fewer & more feasible approaches definitely beats the alternative. FYI, /John p.s. Disclaimers: my views alone; your mileage may vary; this email composed with 100% recycled electrons...On Feb 16, 2026, at 11:21 PM, nanog--- via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote: It would be nice if bad laws were impossible to comply with. Then nobody would comply with them. Then someone comes along and finds there's a way to sell the appearance of complying with the law (even though actual compliance is impossible) as a service, and everybody is forced to buy the service so they don't get prosecuted. Just one more instance of bad politics and capitalism messing everything up for everybody. On 16 February 2026 15:08:46 CET, Michael Greenup via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:It is important to consider the extent to which US state government mandates influence the regulation of content access. For instance, numerous states now require identity verification for viewers of adult content to confirm their age. Many of these laws are formulated such that any viewer within the state's jurisdiction must be verified, necessitating IP address-based geolocation to ensure compliance. Not saying I agree or disagree here, just laying out a regulated use case. YMMV. Regards, Michael The views and opinions included in this email belong to the author and are not representative of the views and opinions of the company which employs me. If you find a spelling or grammatical error, you may keep it. Rich Kulawiec wrote:On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 10:25:56PM -0800, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:Personally, I???ve always thought that IP Geolocation was a bad idea and nothing I???ve seen in the usage of it to date has changed my mind. Agree. We've spent decades trying to build a network that allows everyoneto access everything independent of geographical location, and now people have come along with broken business models which demand that we abandon this fundamental principle of the Internet in order to accomodate them. ---rsk_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/VT47D47CAP6GHJWQARWCY5Z7N3EXJPUK/_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/LYLXWZI7QLGDP5P5YWEHMY6NXDIJKGWF/_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/2UKQXS3SZK4JHCW52URJAVTNIQPPQWO2/
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die | bzs () TheWorld com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/4CRA3EA4IQBHCLJSAYAN77PNUROPRE2E/
Current thread:
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good, (continued)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Rich Kulawiec via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Dmitriy A. via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Peter Folk via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Michael Greenup via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial nanog--- via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial Mel Beckman via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial John Curran via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial Barry Shein via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good John Doherty via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Barry Shein via NANOG (Feb 16)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Feb 15)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 16)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Serhii via NANOG (Feb 16)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 16)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Mu via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Brandon Butterworth via NANOG (Feb 17)
