nanog mailing list archives
Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good
From: Tom Beecher via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 17:17:03 -0500
Ryan- Geofeeds don’t ‘help’ IPInfo because they ignore them if their measurement platform comes up with a conflicting result. Anyone who publishes a geofeed has already provided the answers for free. Why should I help a commercial entity clean up the data that they sell when I’ve already done the work to give the answers for nothing? On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 14:48 Ryan Hamel via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
Geofeeds are automated submissions and corrections, which helps them regardless. Are you not going to produce and maintain a geofeed, because it helps for-profit businesses? Ryan Hamel Kind regards, Ryan Hamel ________________________________ From: Chris Adams via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2026 11:38:31 AM To: nanog () lists nanog org <nanog () lists nanog org> Cc: Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net> Subject: Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Caution: This is an external email and may be malicious. Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments. Once upon a time, Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> said:Hi Chris, Thank you for flagging this. You can submit a correction if you want:https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fipinfo.io%2Fcorrections&data=05%7C02%7Cryan%40rkhtech.org%7C8c3fca1e214a4ca61cee08de6d930bb6%7C81c24bb4f9ec4739ba4d25c42594d996%7C0%7C0%7C639068675489912412%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Blw4zlHWpusg7w6jnXookA4YP0h7S5woFaKFz%2BPnyEE%3D&reserved=0 <https://ipinfo.io/corrections> Why should I provide free help for your for-profit service? -- Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net> _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.nanog.org%2Farchives%2Flist%2Fnanog%40lists.nanog.org%2Fmessage%2F6NP56MG2FOBFYBPV6GIKDKOUGGPNYZ5I%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cryan%40rkhtech.org%7C8c3fca1e214a4ca61cee08de6d930bb6%7C81c24bb4f9ec4739ba4d25c42594d996%7C0%7C0%7C639068675489957338%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=LIX%2BVbBEh4pjfIHvvTtYbopxAJ9qv5rTzLTdUbBSjls%3D&reserved=0 < https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/6NP56MG2FOBFYBPV6GIKDKOUGGPNYZ5I/_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/AYXSXQNWOTO6GYFVRZ2JNH3RTMUNUWQB/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/YOEIJQLJ7ZGVFG47ZMXBXF2LCSSOOPI2/
Current thread:
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good, (continued)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good John Curran via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG (Feb 18)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good nicocamarao--- via NANOG (Feb 18)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Chris Adams via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Chris Adams via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Ryan Hamel via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 15)
