nanog mailing list archives
Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good
From: Chris Adams via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 13:38:31 -0600
Once upon a time, Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> said:
Hi Chris, Thank you for flagging this. You can submit a correction if you want: https://ipinfo.io/corrections
Why should I provide free help for your for-profit service? -- Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net> _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/6NP56MG2FOBFYBPV6GIKDKOUGGPNYZ5I/
Current thread:
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good, (continued)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good John Curran via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good John Curran via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG (Feb 18)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good nicocamarao--- via NANOG (Feb 18)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Chris Adams via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Chris Adams via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Ryan Hamel via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 15)
