nanog mailing list archives
Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good
From: Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 05:31:54 -0000
Hi Chris, Thank you for flagging this. You can submit a correction if you want: https://ipinfo.io/corrections — Abdullah | DevRel, IPinfo _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/4WS233C2QYLPRV5REYF57U2URR4XKPPC/
Current thread:
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good, (continued)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Brandon Butterworth via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good John Curran via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good John Curran via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG (Feb 18)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good nicocamarao--- via NANOG (Feb 18)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Chris Adams via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Chris Adams via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Ryan Hamel via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 15)