nanog mailing list archives
Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good
From: Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 18:23:41 -0000
Hi Tom, You're right. The form language contradicts what I've been saying in this thread. That's on me for not catching the inconsistency. The form was written before our recent discussions about how we communicate our methodology. I've just updated it to better reflect our actual decision process: we use multiple data sources including active measurements and geofeeds, and when they conflict, we investigate rather than automatically prioritizing one over the other. Thank you for flagging the discrepancy. — Abdullah | DevRel, IPinfo _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/WXU2OCQ3MCCDWH3IZR3SLCVPHOHOLEXL/
Current thread:
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good, (continued)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 16)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Mu via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Brandon Butterworth via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good John Curran via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good John Curran via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG (Feb 18)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good nicocamarao--- via NANOG (Feb 18)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Chris Adams via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Chris Adams via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Ryan Hamel via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 15)
