Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good

[John Curran via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

> On Feb 17, 2026, at 12:18 PM, Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
> ….
> The limitation you’re identifying is real. We could do more proactive outreach when we detect conflicts. That's 
> valuable feedback. Would you recommend a specific approach - perhaps flagging high-confidence conflicts in a report 
> ISPs could opt into?

“I know what I don’t know” (i.e. there’s no reason my opinion here would be either well-informed or particularly 
relevant) – but I am certain that some of the operators on this list will have timely suggestions…

Thanks!
/John

p.s. Disclaimers: my views alone; may cause drowsiness – use caution when operating heavy machinery. 




_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/ZXIH5JHM666XI4C63RQF3MNC3FNMZNJK/