nanog mailing list archives
RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good
From: Serhii via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 00:28:48 +0000
Hey Abdullah, A lot of network operators here highlighted the fact they specifically maintain their geofeeds to ensure GeoIP services to serve accurate information. Also, it was mentioned in the thread that not many networks publish geofeed (or share one with you). Therefore, why wouldn't your team consider flagging "adversial" geofeeds/networks instead of relying onto whatever your active probing network is? If ipinfo genuinely cares about feedback, this is the only way forward to somewhat improve the situation for legitimate home internet service providers. _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/YUMSOP7GB2D2C5LXZCQ7LY56HX67BXZD/
Current thread:
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial, (continued)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial nanog--- via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial Mel Beckman via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial John Curran via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial Barry Shein via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good John Doherty via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Barry Shein via NANOG (Feb 16)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Feb 15)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 16)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Serhii via NANOG (Feb 16)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 16)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Mu via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Brandon Butterworth via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good John Curran via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good John Curran via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG (Feb 18)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good nicocamarao--- via NANOG (Feb 18)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 17)
