nanog mailing list archives
Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good
From: Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 08:41:33 -0800
That regulation doesn’t require you to know where the user is unless you are trying to avoid age verification for users not subject to their jurisdiction. It’s also questionable, if you are outside their jurisdiction whether they can subject you to such extra-territorial overreach, but in the tRump/Putin/Shi world order, sovereignty and jurisdiction seem to be less relevant and rule of law may no longer matter as much in restricting government power, so all bets are off. Owen
On Feb 16, 2026, at 06:09, Michael Greenup via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote: It is important to consider the extent to which US state government mandates influence the regulation of content access. For instance, numerous states now require identity verification for viewers of adult content to confirm their age. Many of these laws are formulated such that any viewer within the state's jurisdiction must be verified, necessitating IP address-based geolocation to ensure compliance. Not saying I agree or disagree here, just laying out a regulated use case. YMMV. Regards, Michael The views and opinions included in this email belong to the author and are not representative of the views and opinions of the company which employs me. If you find a spelling or grammatical error, you may keep it. Rich Kulawiec wrote:On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 10:25:56PM -0800, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: Personally, I???ve always thought that IP Geolocation was a bad idea and nothing I???ve seen in the usage of it to date has changed my mind. Agree. We've spent decades trying to build a network that allows everyoneto access everything independent of geographical location, and now people have come along with broken business models which demand that we abandon this fundamental principle of the Internet in order to accomodate them. ---rsk_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/VT47D47CAP6GHJWQARWCY5Z7N3EXJPUK/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/LGSXM7MKVH5KXUUCDXDPZRW7YG4LEK4B/
Current thread:
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good, (continued)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Rich Kulawiec via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Dmitriy A. via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Peter Folk via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Michael Greenup via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial nanog--- via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial Mel Beckman via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial John Curran via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial Barry Shein via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good John Doherty via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Barry Shein via NANOG (Feb 16)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Feb 15)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 16)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Serhii via NANOG (Feb 16)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 16)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Mu via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Brandon Butterworth via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 17)
