nanog mailing list archives
Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good
From: David Prall via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 10:57:27 -0500
The data returned for me is semi-accurate. The postal code is incorrect even though whois has the correct postal code for the ASN and IP Address.
Server isn't dual stacked, so only getting IPv4 info. Unless I utilize the URL based IPv6 lookup which does work. Would be nice if the server was dual-stacked and returned the IPv6 connection details and probed the IPv4 information via a single stacked source.
David -- https://dprall.net On 2/16/2026 12:17 AM, Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG wrote:
HiThe what-is-my-ip-address gives a 404Sorry about that. "https://ipinfo.io/what-is-my-ip" is the correct IP address. — Abdullah | DevRel, IPinfo _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/ML335FMOMD4BJK6OHHC2LG53FHHQ5QTO/
_______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/CXO6LFWEHJETGMTX4A6EHS4EZQIJMNKO/
Current thread:
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Kevin Tillery via NANOG (Feb 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Kevin Tillery via NANOG (Feb 07)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 11)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good nanog--- via NANOG (Feb 14)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 14)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Laszlo H via NANOG (Feb 15)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tony Patti via NANOG (Feb 15)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good David Prall via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good David Prall via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 11)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tony Patti via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Hank Nussbacher via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Hank Nussbacher via NANOG (Feb 19)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 20)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Rich Kulawiec via NANOG (Feb 16)
