nanog mailing list archives
RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good
From: Tony Patti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2026 13:07:12 -0500
Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote on Sunday, February 15, 2026 12:10 PM:
Any IP address can be looked up directly via URL: https://ipinfo.io/8.8.8.8 (replace with any IP)
THANK YOU Abdullah for your succinct answer to my concern. I just tried your https://ipinfo.io/8.8.8.8 method and I note that it provides a LOT more information (CIDR, Company, City, State, Country, Postal, Timezone, Coordinates, ASN, Abuse Details, and more) than your previously mentioned Lite product (which returns only Country, Continent, and ASN) I compared IPinfo’s answers to MaxMind’s https://www.maxmind.com/en/geoip-demo answers, for a random recent visitor from 44.198.66.156 to my website https://cryptosystemsjournal.com/ and one notable difference is that you specify a larger CIDR block of 44.192.0.0/11 (2,097,152 addresses) whereas MaxMind specifies a much smaller CIDR block 44.198.64.0/19 (8,192 addresses). Tony Patti _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/WYOIBHBYQUAZBZZLV3KY6Z4BRUJGKAEO/
Current thread:
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good, (continued)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 11)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good nanog--- via NANOG (Feb 14)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 14)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Laszlo H via NANOG (Feb 15)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tony Patti via NANOG (Feb 15)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good David Prall via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good David Prall via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 11)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tony Patti via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Hank Nussbacher via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Hank Nussbacher via NANOG (Feb 19)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 20)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Rich Kulawiec via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Dmitriy A. via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 17)
