nanog mailing list archives
Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good
From: Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 17:12:32 -0000
Hi David, Thank you for the feedback. Postal code accuracy: Please email me directly at abdullah () ipinfo io with your IP address. I'll investigate why we're not matching the WHOIS data and update the geofeed priority scoring if needed. Dual-stack support: The website is dual-stacked. We're currently exploring how to display both IPv4 and IPv6 information simultaneously when you visit ipinfo.io/my - this feature is in the ideation stage. For our API service, we provide full dual-stack support: ``` api.ipinfo.io/ip v4.api.ipinfo.io/ip v6.api.ipinfo.io/ip ``` Please send me an email with your IP address and I'll look into the postal code issue. — Abdullah | DevRel, IPinfo _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/WN2QC3JGHJHDAZFA75Q463X7P4FLMN6I/
Current thread:
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good, (continued)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Kevin Tillery via NANOG (Feb 07)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 11)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good nanog--- via NANOG (Feb 14)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 14)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Laszlo H via NANOG (Feb 15)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tony Patti via NANOG (Feb 15)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good David Prall via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good David Prall via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 11)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Kevin Tillery via NANOG (Feb 07)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tony Patti via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Hank Nussbacher via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Hank Nussbacher via NANOG (Feb 19)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 20)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Rich Kulawiec via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Dmitriy A. via NANOG (Feb 16)
