nanog mailing list archives
Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good
From: Hank Nussbacher via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 07:24:57 +0200
On 15/02/2026 20:07, Tony Patti via NANOG wrote:
I compared IPinfo’s answers to MaxMind’s https://www.maxmind.com/en/geoip-demo answers, for a random recent visitor from 44.198.66.156 to my website https://cryptosystemsjournal.com/ and one notable difference is that you specify a larger CIDR block of 44.192.0.0/11 (2,097,152 addresses) whereas MaxMind specifies a much smaller CIDR block 44.198.64.0/19 (8,192 addresses). Tony Patti
Unfortunately, there is not a quality academic paper that has come out yearly comparing the various geo-location DBs and their accuracy (IPv4 & IPv6) down to the 100m-1km level. So in the interim, we will continue to see geo-location DB wars - just like we have had OS wars and IP vs OSI wars.
Regards, Hank _______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/2UA32SPCLNFPONZSIQ3KXNRUO74W7REC/
Current thread:
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good, (continued)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good nanog--- via NANOG (Feb 14)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 14)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Laszlo H via NANOG (Feb 15)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tony Patti via NANOG (Feb 15)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good David Prall via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good David Prall via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 16)
- RE: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tony Patti via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Hank Nussbacher via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Hank Nussbacher via NANOG (Feb 19)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 20)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial — was Re: Geofeeds are good Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Rich Kulawiec via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Dmitriy A. via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Tom Beecher via NANOG (Feb 17)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Geofeeds are adversarial ??? was Re: Geofeeds are good Peter Folk via NANOG (Feb 17)
