Re: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing)

[Bryan Fields via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

On 12/2/25 3:57 PM, Matthew Petach via NANOG wrote:
> So, if we limit packets to a constant small size, say 53 bytes, we'd have
> faster connections, right?
>
> I think we should make a proposal for a new internet standard--this would
> help speed up network connections for everyone!
>
> Now we just need a catchy name for the new standard packet size...something
> like "Accelerated Transfer Methodology" that the trade publications can
> splash across the headlines in 18 point type.

I've heard ATM defined as something else..

ATM didn't die, it just moved internal to the routing chipsets :-)

-- 
Bryan Fields

727-409-1194 - Voice
http://bryanfields.net
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/42PO4RPJYU7L37BBXUJGHJQGYJKQ5BIT/