nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing)
From: Tom Beecher via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 11:54:35 -0500
At least once or twice a month I'm downloading something and will find the IPv4 to transfer significantly faster. Case in point, I downloaded the proxmox iso yesterday to a colo server with 50g uplinks. It loafed at 2.4 mbytes/s using default wget, which of course preferred ipv6. Adding -4 to wget made that shoot up to 80 mbytes/s.
Lots of reasons that could explain that which have nothing to do with traffic being v4 vs v6. On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 4:44 PM Bryan Fields via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
On 12/1/25 14:22, Jared Mauch via NANOG wrote:I find myself having to tether off their networks when I’m on IPv4 only networks to access things like my hypervisors and other assets that are IPv6-only because they have superior networking these days.While I'll agree v6 is easy and should be deployed I have to take issue with the current as-built being superior. At least once or twice a month I'm downloading something and will find the IPv4 to transfer significantly faster. Case in point, I downloaded the proxmox iso yesterday to a colo server with 50g uplinks. It loafed at 2.4 mbytes/s using default wget, which of course preferred ipv6. Adding -4 to wget made that shoot up to 80 mbytes/s. This is ipv6 behavior I've seen time and time again. I'm unsure where problems like these lie in the network, other than it's not mine or my peers. I've seen the same issues with v6 paths to the same server bounce around the west coast and back, whilst IPv4 is 6 hops and 12 ms away. This is exactly the sort of thing that holds IPv6 back by giving it a bad name. -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice http://bryanfields.net _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/APA2YIX47NF7U65G2HIBAPHT3X6EWRIG/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/LJXZWLE2DECRYYPK5IVAGT3FBGM7A7W7/
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing), (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) William Herrin via NANOG (Dec 02)
- RE: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Dec 02)
- Re: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 02)
- RE: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Dec 02)
- Re: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) William Herrin via NANOG (Dec 03)
- RE: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Matthew Petach via NANOG (Dec 02)
- Re: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Bryan Fields via NANOG (Dec 02)
- Re: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Lukasz Bromirski via NANOG (Dec 02)
- RE: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Dec 02)
- Re: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Dec 02)
- RE: IPv4 Pricing Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Dec 01)
- RE: IPv4 Pricing Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: IPv4 Pricing Josh Luthman via NANOG (Dec 01)
- RE: IPv4 Pricing Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: IPv4 Pricing Chris Woodfield via NANOG (Dec 01)
- RE: IPv4 Pricing Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: IPv4 Pricing Jared Mauch via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: My ISP won't do a /29 Mike Hammett via NANOG (Dec 07)
