nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv4 Pricing
From: Gary Sparkes via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 18:06:49 +0000
I have customers running v6 only services due to cost. Your customers cannot access mine. Fortunately, there's no overlap between our customer bases yet, though I have had to help two of my consulting customers set up IPv6 tunneling on their edge networks due to local ISPs being... obstinate. ISPs like you are generating more revenue for me because you aren't supporting IPv6, and it is very much necessary in 2025. -----Original Message----- From: Josh Luthman via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> Sent: Monday, December 1, 2025 10:56 AM To: Mu <mu () zuqq me> Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog () lists nanog org>; Aaron C. de Bruyn <aaron () heyaaron com>; Josh Luthman <josh () imaginenetworksllc com> Subject: Re: IPv4 Pricing I need a business reason to make the business do IPv6. I do not need a technical reason. This thread has shown there is no business use case for global IPv6. I also want to throw this out there: Metronet residential (last I heard 7th largest fiber provider in the US, this was well before the Tmobile acquisition) doesn't even give out public IPs. They do IPv4 only CGNAT. You can get a /32 static at $15/mo (in some areas). On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 10:51 AM Mu <mu () zuqq me> wrote:
the reason "you still need v4 for a working Internet" is because people like you keep saying crap like "v6 is a joke". thanks for that! On Monday, December 1st, 2025 at 10:08 AM, Josh Luthman via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:Aaron, As a small operator I would ask why you need a /29 the first place.Secondwhy don't you just get your own ASN? Are you willing to pay more to support v6? Or do you think the ISP should add that service for free? Imo v6 is a joke because you still need v4 for a working Internet. I understand there are benefits but this is 2025 and you can't get bywithoutv4. On Mon, Dec 1, 2025, 10:03 AM Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:I wish they were dropping in my area. I called my backwoods ISP last week (they are a monopoly with ~4,000fibercustomers) to go from a single static at my office to a /29 and theysaid"It's $300/mo". I asked why it was so high and they said "My boss doesn't likeconfiguringthem, so he set the price really high". Then I asked when IPv6 would be available and got the same answer I got back in 2019: "My boss said he was thinking about looking into it next year". -A On Sun, Nov 30, 2025 at 6:12 PM Tom Mitchell via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:v4 addresses have been dropping rapidly. They were as high as $65lastyear. Now, there are offers for $11. Average market price now is inthemid-$20's. All the NA ISPs have been selling much of their inventory. Why not. - Tom On Sun, Nov 30, 2025 at 11:23 AM Mike Hammett via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:What are you using for guides for IPv4 pricing? There are a bunchofundated blogs, which don't mean much if there's no date. Hilco's blog says somewhere around $27 for a /22 to /24: https://www.ipv4.global/reports/october-2025/ but then fast forward a month on their auction page and it's downto$22: https://auctions.ipv4.global/prior-sales These guys stopped updating in June: https://ipv4market.eu/ipv4-market-average-sale-prices-2025/ ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/UW JDG6X3FH73ELJRSEX4O4BIK7CS7EAQ/_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/2D P5TTAHK4CN2HXHNLLYN225JNLQYJIO/_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/5D 2RDOWMRXX4634VKZO33X4YAR7RYMDK/_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/XW AJ5B7ZIBEPUGWIUKS42N3AM76AMWRV/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/3HDQ4IOL7WVYZUUSRW2SXPKGP5JXZJHS/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/G3RT3UDZO7SZ2K73MBRLBL363BK6MCEA/
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing), (continued)
- RE: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Dec 02)
- Re: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Marco Moock via NANOG (Dec 02)
- RE: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Dec 02)
- Re: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) William Herrin via NANOG (Dec 03)
- RE: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Matthew Petach via NANOG (Dec 02)
- Re: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Bryan Fields via NANOG (Dec 02)
- Re: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Lukasz Bromirski via NANOG (Dec 02)
- RE: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Dec 02)
- Re: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Dec 02)
- RE: IPv4 Pricing Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Dec 01)
- RE: IPv4 Pricing Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: IPv4 Pricing Josh Luthman via NANOG (Dec 01)
- RE: IPv4 Pricing Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: IPv4 Pricing Chris Woodfield via NANOG (Dec 01)
- RE: IPv4 Pricing Gary Sparkes via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: IPv4 Pricing Jared Mauch via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: My ISP won't do a /29 Mike Hammett via NANOG (Dec 07)
