Re: IPv4 Pricing

[Jared Mauch via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

> On Dec 1, 2025, at 10:55 AM, Josh Luthman via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
>
> I need a business reason to make the business do IPv6.  I do not need a
> technical reason.  This thread has shown there is no business use case for
> global IPv6.
>
> I also want to throw this out there:  Metronet residential (last I heard
> 7th largest fiber provider in the US, this was well before the Tmobile
> acquisition) doesn't even give out public IPs.  They do IPv4 only CGNAT.
> You can get a /32 static at $15/mo (in some areas).

They also turned off IPv6 in networks they acquired, which is sad.

I know it caused some of the more technical people I know to leave their service, not that is a business case, but it’s 
a churn case.

- Jared
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/QMQHVM4OHOW5ANPMPC7MJKDPJIEIM3Q4/