Re: Worsening google service reputation and abuse

[Anoop Ghanwani via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 11:54 AM Michael Thomas via NANOG <
nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:

> Here's what I don't understand: Gmail's spam filtering from everything I
> can tell is really good. Is the implication that they don't run their
> spam filters on posts to Google Groups? Wouldn't that hurt Google
> Groups' reputation for other spam filters? It seems like such an easy
> problem for them to solve.

I disagree.  Gmail spam filtering has been pretty bad for me.  A lot of
mailing list traffic (various IETF lists and even NANOG) and responses from
businesses that I communicate with end up in my spam folder.  And a lot of
real spam and phishing messages end up in my inbox.  If I could, I would
disable it and do my spam filtering manually.  It would be less work than
undoing the mess that the current filter creates.
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/3YG26GLING6YXLWFLDF3A7R426TGKFBV/